Home | Recreation And Leisure | Entertainment

Common Strategies of Animated Comedy

By: Myra Leigh

Read More About Entertainment

As an impartial filmmaker specializing in animated comedy, I might wish to share my thoughts and observations on the best way to create initiatives meant to make folks chuckle (in a good way). By taking a detailed look at current fashionable exhibits and films (i.e. Simpsons, Household Guy, Shrek, and so on) I've outlined a quick analysis that identifies a few of the main methods of humor used in lots of as we speak's animated television packages and exhibits, in addition to the benefits/disadvantages of implementing them. Just a be aware before we continue: this text is not meant solely as a guide for comedy filmmakers- I'm sure those of you who admire good humor will get something out of it as well.
The next compilation is the result of my own observations, and I'm sure you'll see what I mean in the event you take a closer look this Sunday night time when Household Guy comes on. Later, I will share a few of my own thoughts as regards to creating efficient humor for mainstream audiences.
1. PARODY: This includes poking fun of properly-identified genres and plot formulas (motion, horror, porn, and so on), and making references to properly-identified films, TV exhibits, famous folks, vital historic events, etc. Fairly often, these genres, films, and TV exhibits are spoofed. Consider the variety of occasions you have seen a reference to a Kubrick movie throughout an episode of The Simpsons, or a Star Wars reference in Household Guy to emphasise a joke.
Advantages: First off, it is easy to do and sometimes elicits laughs. The basic construction of the joke is predicated on a well known supply, and the viewers is likely to get it right away.
Disadvantages: To be blunt, it is lazy filmmaking. An excessive amount of parody thrown in a story can usually be interpreted as an absence of creativity/originality, and ultimately limits the mission's depth. Jokes/gags of this type will solely last as long as the spoofed or referenced topic is fashionable or is fashionable.
2. ANIMATION THAT IS DELIBERATELY BAD/CHEESY: Includes using poorly drawn/animated characters and backgrounds as an vital element of the humor.
Advantages: Generally extra efficient and more cost effective than using extra detailed animation techniques. It is humorous to watch and calling some attention to the unhealthy animation can generate new jokes and great sight gags. Consider exhibits like Aqua Teen Hunger Pressure and Sealab 2021.
Disadvantages: Like the parody, this will quickly flip into lazy filmmaking. Depending solely on unhealthy animation for laughs may make the mission tough to take care of in the lengthy run.
3. GROSS-OUT HUMOR/EXPLICIT LANGUAGE: Includes humor that is, however not limited to being scatological, sexual, bloody, etc. Also includes use of foul language. Because the Simpsons and South Park, audiences have come to count on jokes of this kind.
Advantages: In small doses and if executed with subtlety, gross-out humor and using specific language mixed with visual sight gags could be hilarious.
Drawback: Easy to overuse. Dialogue containing too many four-letter phrases for the sake of being obnoxious will flip off most viewers. Gross-out humor, if solely used for shock value, will seem shallow if it does nothing to contribute to the general story.
4. NON-SEQUITORS (RANDOM HUMOR): Jokes, statements, events, etc. that happen out of nowhere.
Advantages: Absurd humor that happens at random works on a number of levels, which include the outlandishness of the act itself, its unpredictability, and likewise its general disregard for logic in context with the scene's apparent focus. It could possibly take an viewers by surprise, and might add some originality to the project.
Disadvantages: If an absurd and random act all of the sudden shifts the main target of the story, it may disappoint viewers who have otherwise been engaged in the narrative. Also, many people might not "get it," which has the potential of restricting the viewing demographic. When a nonsequitor serves as a story's conclusion, it is normally proof of an incapability to create an efficient ending.
On creating more practical humor:
Characters with distinctive qualities: Trying to be authentic is not straightforward, however it's lots of fun. When creating characters, don't be concerned too much about whatever's "hip" or "in" at the moment. Start off with characters which have very specific character traits, habits, etc. Base them off yourself, off of people you understand, your experiences, or simply let your imagination run wild. Give your characters specific hobbies, unusual pursuits (i.e. a hero that can't resist objects that squirt water), and/or specific likes/dislikes. These concrete qualities will usually provide alternatives to develop character, storylines, and above all, humorous events.
Stories with strong conclusions: Many creative folks I've talked to note the problem of coming up with good endings. No matter what the style, filmmakers of all sorts can be taught a beneficial lesson from mystery novel authors. When you provide you with the idea for a movie, start by knowing how it may end. This provides the story focus, and makes it easier for all the events to logically pan out. Another vital tip to recollect- audiences will virtually always forgive a movie with a nasty starting, however will never forgive a movie with a nasty ending.
Perceive that being humorous is not the same as acting humorous: Okay, what does this mean? Here's an illustration: There was a video on the internet of a careless skateboarder falling on his face multiple occasions after attempting to coast off the roof of his parents' house. It wasn't humorous to the skateboarder, however it was humorous to most of the people who noticed it happen. Why? On a psychological degree, it is in our nature to chuckle or take some form of satisfaction in another person's misfortune/failure as long as the screw-up does not end in loss of life or dismemberment (most of the time). On a extra practical degree, many of the online viewers laughed at the sheer idiocy of the act. After all, the careless skateboarder who plunged off the roof really expected optimistic results from his stunt. So how do we apply this to creating comedy? Create conditions that are humorous to the viewers, however not to your characters. One efficient approach of doing this is having your characters count on critical results from doing issues that are clearly harmful, stupid, or both.

Article Source: http://depositarticles.com/

These are only a few pointers that can assist you get began with creating your personal comedy, or that can assist you understand some of the more successful comedy on the market today. I hope you loved the article. Have a great giggle!

Please Rate this Article

 

Not yet Rated

Click the XML Icon Above to Receive Entertainment Articles Via RSS!
Additional Articles From - Home | Recreation And Leisure | Entertainment
Sign Up for a free account.
Our other websites
All about SEO
Beauty Tips Forum
Submit Articles
Member Login
Link Us
Submission Guidelines
Ezine Notifications
Article RSS Feeds
Sitemap
New Stuff
About Us
Developer
Good shopping portal
Link to Us
Contact Us
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service

counter easy hit

Powered by Article Dashboard